SamColtFan
17 March 2002, 00:25
T86 advised to post under this section.
An acquaintance of mine was in Viet Nam. He claims that he was a Black Beret.
According to an April 1967 COMRIVPATFOR memo to RIVPARFOR, it stated:
(E) ONLY RIVER PATROL FORCE PERSONNEL MAY WEAR BERET. THIS INCLUDES LST PERSONNEL AND MINESWEEPER, HELICOPTER AND SEAL DETACHMENTS. NO OTHERS ARE AUTHORIZED.
My acquaintance stated that he was in a unit called Boat Support Unit One. He said that Mobile Support Team (MST) personnel came from BSU-1 and when deployed for 6 months in RVN with the SEALs they were an integrated unit. The purpose of the MST units was to insert and extract SEALs (I'm told). He also stated he was not assigned to a PBR unit. He was an MST that worked with the SEALs.
So, my question is, under these circumstances was my acquaintance authorized to wear the Black Beret?
He was in Viet Nam in 1969.
Regards,
Sam
An acquaintance of mine was in Viet Nam. He claims that he was a Black Beret.
According to an April 1967 COMRIVPATFOR memo to RIVPARFOR, it stated:
(E) ONLY RIVER PATROL FORCE PERSONNEL MAY WEAR BERET. THIS INCLUDES LST PERSONNEL AND MINESWEEPER, HELICOPTER AND SEAL DETACHMENTS. NO OTHERS ARE AUTHORIZED.
My acquaintance stated that he was in a unit called Boat Support Unit One. He said that Mobile Support Team (MST) personnel came from BSU-1 and when deployed for 6 months in RVN with the SEALs they were an integrated unit. The purpose of the MST units was to insert and extract SEALs (I'm told). He also stated he was not assigned to a PBR unit. He was an MST that worked with the SEALs.
So, my question is, under these circumstances was my acquaintance authorized to wear the Black Beret?
He was in Viet Nam in 1969.
Regards,
Sam