PDA

View Full Version : MOS Nomenclature Question


Dark Helmet
27 October 2000, 00:23
This is for the green beenies out there:

What is the "Oscar" in the following MOS?

18D4OW7

I know the 18D is SF weapons, 4 is SL 4 or E7, and the W7 is Scuba....what is the Oscar in between the 4 and W?

If the trooper were Ranger qual'd, he'd be a Victor, and to my knowledge there is no such animal as an 18D4QW7 (Q being Ranger but not airborne qual'd), as the SF MOS guys would have basic airborne at a minimum to hold those the 18 series CMF.....

Help me out?

TackDaBoat
11B2V

gear_guru
27 October 2000, 01:02
G is a leg ranger, not Q. It is really 0 (zero) not an O (oscar). Any missing digits are zeros. They don't use the P because they are required to be airborne qualified as part of their MOS. I am suprised there isn't an L there for linguist since every one is required to take the DLPT at least out of the course and they give an L to you for getting at least a 1. You didn't have a language code at the end tho so that explains that I guess.

Dark Helmet
27 October 2000, 01:23
Roger, Gear Guru. Thanks.

Stand corrected on the leg Ranger SSI.

Jeff Rambo
27 October 2000, 03:08
And to put what GG said in "simpler terms" O/Oscar would mean no special qualifications.

- Out

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.

Jeff Rambo
27 October 2000, 03:09
Q by the way is EOA.

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.

Jeff Rambo
27 October 2000, 03:10
Just realized one more thing ...

18D is SF Medic, not SF Weapons SGT (18B)

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.

jeff
27 October 2000, 10:49
You'll only get the "L" for graduating from DLI. Simply taking the DLPT and going through basic stuff after the Q course doesn't cut it. You'll get the two letter code at the end of your MOS. For instance. 18B4W8CX(czech)
Jeff

E19
27 October 2000, 14:14
Originally posted by gear_guru:
It is really 0 (zero) not an O (oscar). Any missing digits are zeros.


You are incorrect...it is "O" (Oscar) for "No Special Qualifications"

E19 OUT

gear_guru
27 October 2000, 21:53
I stand corrected...E19 is absolutely correct. Oscar is No Special Qualifications. Sorry about that. There are a few numberical SQIs but the only one I have ever seen used is 4 for Non-Career Recruiter. As far as L goes, you don't have to be a DLI grad to have it. You just have to be in a linguist coded position. I have seen 18s who didn't go to DLI with an L. Remember, an entire MOS is 9 digits long.

[This message has been edited by gear_guru (edited 10-28-2000).]

EODestruction
28 October 2000, 01:13
I THOUGHT IT WAS A ZERO BUT IT GOES WITH THE
FOUR. FOR EXAMPLE 10,20,30,40 LEVEL IS THE SKILL LEVEL. E1-E4 10 LEVEL,E5 20 LEVEL E-6 30 LEVEL IS THIS NOT CORRECT?

AND YOU CAN GET THE LIMA IDENTIFIER WITH OUT THE DLA IF YOU TAKE THE DLPT AND SCORE HIGH ENOUGH I THINK IT IS 2 2 YOU PUT IN A 4187 REQUEST FOR THE IDENTIFIER AND YOU SHOULD GET IT.

Jeff Rambo
28 October 2000, 02:18
GG,

Just my OWN HUMBLE opinion, but I wouldn't even bother mentioning the T SQI in open fourms even though its public info, or else every gumby dipshit and their illegitiment (sp?) kids will go around with various MOS horning the T SQI and living 10,000 miles away from Bragg to boot if you get my drift ...


Just my $.02,
- Out

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.

Jeff Rambo
28 October 2000, 02:21
And btw, I believe the only numeric SQIs still in use are: 2- TD, 4- N-CR, 6- MADO.

- Out

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.

RKW
28 October 2000, 03:12
Originally posted by gear_guru:
By the way, my fav SQI remains T, and no I never had it.


Its hush, hush, but also on About.com...

gear_guru
28 October 2000, 04:02
Better?

[This message has been edited by gear_guru (edited 10-28-2000).]

JY
28 October 2000, 04:18
Jeff;

Think G.G.already started it http://www.specialoperations.com/ubboard/rolleyes.gif

take care...Jim, Sine Pari

[This message has been edited by JY (edited 10-28-2000).]

jeff
28 October 2000, 04:22
I'm going to need some clarification on this L-thing. I was 18B for some years and never did I have a "L" on my MOS. Only after graduating DLI did i recieve the coveted "L". Now I agree about the possibility that a rating of 2/2 my qualify you for it but simply being in a language coded position, i'm not so sure.
This is purely military trivia, I'm not expert at this, but it makes for interesting talk when your in a hide-site for a week.
Jeff

Jeff Rambo
28 October 2000, 05:09
Yep RKW ... like I said, its non-classified info, but it is still better (IMO) to keep it on the DL as much as possible to limit the surplus of wannabes out there.

- Out

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.

gear_guru
28 October 2000, 12:18
The reason you got it after graduating DLI is because it was a TRADOC school. Kind of like when you graduated jump school and they cut you P orders. If you qualified on your own outside of DLI you needed to submit a 4187.

jeff
28 October 2000, 15:56
all right, i'll buy that. My wife was a 98G, she said my idea was all f**ked up. I liked your explanation better. How would I have qualified before I went? I had already been to a Polish course after the Q-course, so if I'd put the 4187 in i'd been awarded the much sought after "L" :-)

gear_guru
28 October 2000, 20:43
All you needed to do to qualify was attain a 1/1 on the DLPT.

Dark Helmet
29 October 2000, 22:32
Originally posted by E19:

You are incorrect...it is "O" (Oscar) for "No Special Qualifications"


Stumbled across a web page supporting this:
http://usmilitary.about.com/careers/usmilitary/library/milinfo/blarmyenlskillids.htm

RKW
30 October 2000, 17:04
Reading down I got to the 'W' section. I knew what the other W ASIs were, but I didnt know what one meant.
W5 OH­58D QUALIFICATION

Any insight into this? Or is it OPSEC?
Thanks for any help you can offer.
RKW

Jeff Rambo
30 October 2000, 18:25
RKW,

The OH­58D is one of (if not the) most advanced helicopters in the Army today, as well the newest if I'm not mistaken. It's main purpose is armed reconnaissance. I'm almost sure that Bell Helicopter Textron got the contract for them ... so thats that.

It's "nickname" is either Kiowah Warrior or Kiowa Warrior ... not sure on the spelling.

You can probably find some info and pics on it if you do a search on the web I'm sure. And I believe FLTCRW possibly might be able to give you some more info on it.

Hope this helps, take Care.

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.

Jeff Rambo
30 October 2000, 18:27
Just did some hunting myself .... and came up with this:

http://www2.msstate.edu/~jbc4/IMAGES/oh58d1.jpg

Some more info: http://www2.msstate.edu/~jbc4/company.html (Also confirms that BHT did get the contract, and it is the newest helo in the Army)

- Out

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.

FLTCREW1
30 October 2000, 21:17
Originally posted by Jeff Rambo:
(Also confirms that......., and it is the newest helo in the Army)

Well, they weren't telling the whole truth now were they, LOL http://www.boeing.com/rotorcraft/military/rah66/

NSDQ

Jeff Rambo
30 October 2000, 21:22
LOL FLT ... Roger. Thanks for clearing that up ... guess it was outdated, and I remember reading the info on the OH58D a year and a half ago, so I was outdated myself. Thats one reason I said you'd be able to shed more light to it.

BTW ... does that RAH-66 Comanche come with AC and a Digital FM Radio? LOL ... might have to find a local dealership ... looks pretty nice.

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.

FLTCREW1
30 October 2000, 21:26
Originally posted by RKW:
W5 OH­58D QUALIFICATION
Any insight into this? Or is it OPSEC?
Thanks for any help you can offer.
RKW

I believe it is for the 67S's (OH-58 mechanics) that transition to OH-58D's
The main difference is that ball on the top of the 58D.

NSDQ

FLTCREW1
30 October 2000, 21:29
Jeff,
I have not had the pleasure of getting up close to one, according to the article on that sight, they are not suppose to hit service until 2006.

NSDQ

Jeff Rambo
30 October 2000, 22:55
Rog

------------------
Sincerely,
Jeff A. Rambo
NBTNDT
------------------
Disrespect cannot be commanded, it must be earned.