PDA

View Full Version : Rescue in the News (AF Times)


KJ
28 March 2003, 12:15
AF rescue team returns from harrowing classified mission behind enemy lines

By Gordon Trowbridge
Times staff writer


FROM A FORWARD AIR BASE, Persian Gulf region — U.S. Air Force rescue crews plunged deep into Iraq on Sunday on a marathon mission apparently aimed at aiding coalition ground troops under fire.
Nearly all details of the mission remained classified Sunday evening, Air Force officials said. But interviews with airmen involved and commanders on the ground reflect a harrowing, complicated mission that fully taxed the combat search-and-rescue forces at this base near the Iraqi border, and apparently involved the evacuation of allied ground forces.

“We went deep into our bag of tricks,” said Lt. Col. Pony, a helicopter pilot involved in the mission, after roughly eight hours of flying. “I’m tired, but I’m so full of adrenaline about completing this mission I won’t sleep. I can’t wait until this mission is declassified so we can tell you about it.”

Journalists here are restricted to identifying aircrews only by rank and first name or radio call sign. They have been allowed on this base on condition they not name it or its home nation.

Air Force public affairs officials said they were seeking permission from U.S. Central Command representatives to release more information on the objectives of the rescue mission, but they and the crews involved described them as successful.

Lt. Col. Caz, commander of the HC-130 Hercules rescue planes of the 332nd Expeditionary Rescue Squadron, said the mission involved, at least in part, rescue of U.S. or coalition ground forces, rather than the squadron’s primary mission of extracting downed aircrews.

“Other components of the coalition are finding that we are it,” he said. “Based on today’s experience, it’s clear we’re a rapid-reaction force that can go anywhere and do what has to be done.”

The rescue began in the pre-dawn hours of March 23, when two HH-60 Pave Hawk rescue helicopters were scrambled to respond to a distress call, apparently somewhere in Iraq. As usual, the helicopters were accompanied by HC-130 planes that can refuel the helicopters in the air, as well as A-10 Thunderbolt ground-attack jets to provide firepower in support of any rescue effort.

Both the helicopters and the HC-130s carry Air Force pararescue jumpers, known as PJs, who can parachute or drop onto the ground to provide protection and medical treatment for friendly forces.

Much of the mission is still hidden behind security restrictions. But the crewmembers interviewed said they received three separate taskings — two that had yet to emerge when they launched on their initial alert.

Pony and Maj. “TC,” another HH-60 pilot, said they faced enemy small-arms fire and an indication on their airborne sensors that an Iraqi SA-8 surface-to-air missile was fired at their slow-moving, low-flying helicopters.

The HC-130s involved, another “low-and-slow” aircraft, faced similar threats. The helicopter pilots praised their fixed-wing partners for taking on great risks to provide vital refueling.

“The Kings really hung it out,” Pony said, using the standard radio call sign for HC-130s. “They usually don’t come that far north of the border. But they knew we needed the fuel and they went north for us.”

HC-130 crewmembers weren’t available for interviews because they went directly into a mandated crew-rest period required before their next mission. But Caz, their commander, echoed the praise of the helicopter crews.

“It really comes back to that cliché that we don’t leave anybody behind,” he said. “That’s our sister squadron and when they get to the point where they need the gas, we’re going to get them the gas.”

Commanders here have repeatedly denied media requests to allow reporters aboard the HC-130 aircraft flying combat missions.

The helicopters and HC-130s based here were deployed from Patrick Air Force Base, Fla. The crews — nearly all of them traditional reservists — are from Patrick as well as the Oregon Air National Guard.

While enemy fire was vivid in the minds of the pilots, they said scenes of Iraqi civilians were even more memorable.

TC described a scene in which an Iraqi truck driver, frightened by the helicopters roaring overhead, leapt from his truck — until he saw the U.S. flag painted on the belly of the helicopter, rose, and waved.

“It was surreal,” TC said. “I will never, ever forget that sight.”

j5irons
28 March 2003, 12:37
*Mouth drooling* can't wait until this becomes de-classified!! HOOYAH to the men involved!!

namor
1 April 2003, 10:39
Our thanks to all involved.

Rotor Strike please
19 May 2003, 04:11
Hey, I was there for that one. The pilots way overtold the story. Broad daylight, no enemy fire, blah, blah, blah. The "Kings" did their job, nothing special. It was easier than most training sorties we do. Folks are in a medal frenzy around here, so the story keeps getting bigger and bigger every time its told. We did our job, plain and simple. Nothing extraordinary.

SN
19 May 2003, 04:34
Ryan,

How you guys feel about the move to AFSOC?

Rotor Strike please
19 May 2003, 09:39
Good to Go! We need this to happen. It should have happened years ago. As an example, I'm sitting alert in the middle of Iraq, and not doing any other flying. Meanwhile, there are "other" assets that need airlift that don't get it. We easily could provide that for multiple customers. It is the JSRC that is fucking this whole deal up, not ACC. We could operate well under ACC, but we will operate extremely well under AFSOC. Now, if they will give us a chance it will be fun. I suspect we will be treated like the C or D team for quite a while in AFSOC. We just don't have a reputation of SOF work, so they will be hesistant to use us until we can get a track record going.

KJ
19 May 2003, 10:30
Should be fairly easy for PJs. We (the career field), have gone to great lengths to make a PJ, is a PJ, is a PJ. What does that mean? It means, we trained ALL our PJs to work in any command at the drop of a hat, because that quite often happens. Some of the brass didn't like it. I spent many hours explaining to more than one ACC helicopter only squadron Commander with PJs why they were keeping their helicopter PJs on jump and dive status. Every single year, the PJ functionals had to justify keeping PJs on dive status to whoever was running AETC (becuase they always got a new guy in that didn't want to understand past the dollar line and graduation statistics.) Pain in the ass because we did not really want a white and black side. We were only 310 guys, and we had to be interchangeable. So, that means, to the PJs, it is a bit easier. Honestly, even for the fliers, they always had the capability, they were just not allowed to use it in the conventional side trying to appease commanders that had no idea what they were really capable of, or scared to risk their own careers on something as dangerous as a rescue mission. Hope this makes sense to you.

SN
19 May 2003, 13:04
Ryan,

Your comment about being C or D team is probably correct. I think the PJ's will meld in, but the equal but seperate thing is interesting. You will be classified CSAR, not SOF. That way they can keep the females on board. We will have to see how it shakes out.

DCH
19 May 2003, 14:49
Originally posted by Ryan Renuart
Hey, I was there for that one. The pilots way overtold the story. Broad daylight, no enemy fire, blah, blah, blah. The "Kings" did their job, nothing special. It was easier than most training sorties we do. Folks are in a medal frenzy around here, so the story keeps getting bigger and bigger every time its told. We did our job, plain and simple. Nothing extraordinary.

VERY professional.

JR
19 May 2003, 23:16
Originally posted by KJ
Should be fairly easy for PJs. We (the career field), have gone to great lengths to make a PJ, is a PJ, is a PJ. What does that mean? It means, we trained ALL our PJs to work in any command at the drop of a hat, because that quite often happens. Some of the brass didn't like it. I spent many hours explaining to more than one ACC helicopter only squadron Commander with PJs why they were keeping their helicopter PJs on jump and dive status. Every single year, the PJ functionals had to justify keeping PJs on dive status to whoever was running AETC (becuase they always got a new guy in that didn't want to understand past the dollar line and graduation statistics.) Pain in the ass because we did not really want a white and black side. We were only 310 guys, and we had to be interchangeable. So, that means, to the PJs, it is a bit easier. Honestly, even for the fliers, they always had the capability, they were just not allowed to use it in the conventional side trying to appease commanders that had no idea what they were really capable of, or scared to risk their own careers on something as dangerous as a rescue mission. Hope this makes sense to you.

WAY off subject here, but... Man... This is so similar to what we're going through in ST Weather... We need to train to the toughest mission, bacause any of us should be able to step into the shoes of those executing those missions...

Rotor Strike please
20 May 2003, 04:42
Edited upon further reflection.

Fire-Gunner
20 May 2003, 11:30
Are you home yet, amigo? We got back about a month ago.

Rotor Strike please
20 May 2003, 13:04
Nope, still in theatre. We are the "One Jolly to Rule Them All!";)