recce_o
8 February 2000, 10:27
I look at the M4 and then I look at the 11.5" barrelled Colt Commando and I ask: "Why is the M4 barrel 3 inches longer?" I think I have two answers:
1. Higher muzzle velocity in the longer barrel.
a. The 5.56 mm depends on velocity for terminal ballistic effect. So the question I have here is whether velocity in the 11.5" barrel is sufficiently lowered that wounding effects are decreased.
b. Increased velocity means greater range. Can anyone comment on the effective range of the 11.5" barrel as compared to the 14.5?
2. Reliaiblity. The extra three inches means that gas pressure is maintained in the barrel longer resulting in a greater gas impulse to the bolt carrier and hence, more reliable operation. However, on the 11.5" barrelled weapon I've used I noticed no appreciable decrease in reliability. Anyone have any comments on the reliability issue?
1. Higher muzzle velocity in the longer barrel.
a. The 5.56 mm depends on velocity for terminal ballistic effect. So the question I have here is whether velocity in the 11.5" barrel is sufficiently lowered that wounding effects are decreased.
b. Increased velocity means greater range. Can anyone comment on the effective range of the 11.5" barrel as compared to the 14.5?
2. Reliaiblity. The extra three inches means that gas pressure is maintained in the barrel longer resulting in a greater gas impulse to the bolt carrier and hence, more reliable operation. However, on the 11.5" barrelled weapon I've used I noticed no appreciable decrease in reliability. Anyone have any comments on the reliability issue?