PDA

View Full Version : Interesting Analogy...


Marauder
2 May 2001, 20:59
Found this today while checking out the different Sun Media columnists on Sun Media's website, and found this guy's analogy to be quite interesting, and sorta reflective of my viewpoint on why we Canadians should be so proud of our armed forces members and police officers who head off to help keep the peace and make the world just a little bit better.
Here goes...

May 2, 2001
Bystanders to world's cruelties
Wondering how you can help?
By LAURIE MUSTARD -- Winnipeg Sun

Ever wonder what it might feel like to be dying in front of people you know can help you, but won't? I know what that feels like. I almost drowned once while swimming out to a floating dock at Killarney. The details don't matter, but the bottom line is I was about two metres away from the dock, going under, and calling for people on the dock to jump in, take my daughter (Andrea) who I was holding up, then help me. I was choking, gasping for air, going under.
Four men on the dock just stood there and stared at us. They appeared stunned and took
no action whatsoever. I looked them in the eyes and said, "Help, please ... somebody help my daughter." I'll never forget how they just stood there, looking uncomfortable, and did nothing.

Prayers unanswered

Until it happens to you, you just can't believe other human beings capable of saving your life would choose to turn away. Right now, in countries such as Sierra Leone, kids are wondering why someone can come into their village, cut off one of their hands or feet, maybe kill their parents, rape their mothers and sisters, and nobody does anything about it. Often those same youth are kidnapped, forced to train as rebels, then led back to massacre their own families. In some cases, their own parents. No doubt every day endless numbers of refugees and victims of torture and persecution in countries from Sierra Leone to Tibet and elsewhere wonder why their pleas and prayers for help go unanswered. They know the people of the free world are aware of their plight. They know we have the power, the wealth and the influence to help, but for the most part choose to look the other way and let them die.
Winnipegger Peter Koroma's 62-year-old sister Digba escaped Sierra Leone five years ago, walking a distance the equivalent of Winnipeg to Edmonton with two young grandchildren in tow, and has been a refugee in Guinea ever since. Her life is in danger. Eight months ago, her 25-year-old daughter left for the local market in Guinea and didn't return home. Digba and Peter fear she may have been captured by rebels to serve them and satisfy their sexual needs, or may even be dead. They keep searching. It's all they can do.
What can we do here in Canada, in Winnipeg, to help victims like Digba's daughter, and
thousands of others like her? We can begin by making an effort to be more aware of the atrocities happening elsewhere in the world, then taking steps to make changes for the better. Beginning tomorrow night, Amnesty International and the Winnipeg Refugee Education Network present the first of the Survivors Among Us Human Rights Film Series, 7- 9 p.m., at the Centennial Library Auditorium, 251 Donald Street.
The series begins with Cry Freetown shot in Sierra Leone, followed by A Song for Tibet
on May 10, then Illegal Footage Smuggled out of Burma on May 17, concentrating on the
human rights abuses that children endure on a daily basis.
Following each film there will be a discussion with survivors and human rights
organizations, and a Q&A period.
Winnipeggers can also help by attending "Save A Life" this Sunday, the first fund-raising
banquet for Sierra Leone Refugee Resettlement, Inc., being held at Fort Garry Place. Tickets and further info available by calling Peter at 948-4470.
Last year alone, rebels in Sierra Leone mutilated (by amputation) more than 5,000 women and children. There are more than 50,000 single women and children in various refugee camps whose lives are in danger.
They're wondering how people can stand by, watch, and do nothing.
How can we?

Cole
2 May 2001, 21:42
Wishful thinking if you ask me.

These sorts of things have been happening every day in the last 7000 years of recorded history, and I don't see how sending a small group of soldiers into these messes is going to all of the sudden make it stop.

clemanis
6 May 2001, 23:11
A few hundred soldiers can make a difference! In 1995 the Seirrea Leonean Government hired Executive Outcomes (a private company) to help them deal with the RUF (bad guys). Within six months the RUF was routed, the diamond mines were secured, and people began to feel safe. EO did this buy leading and training the Sierra Leonean Army. But with mounting international pressure, including threats from the World Bank to hold back aid money the mercenaries went home. A short time after that the RUF was back in business, and the citizens were being terrorized again. Its just too bad Sierra Leone wasn't oil rich instead of diamond rich.

------------------

farseer
7 May 2001, 19:18
how about a discussion on the use of private military companies (PMC's)vs expensive UN intevention?

I'm new to the board, but i've done a couple essays on the topic and its very interesting the contracts these guys are getting:

MPRI (US compnany) is training the croation army, Vinnel is traing the saudi's

Executive Outcome did in sierra leone in 2 years for $80 million what the UN couldn't do for over a $1 million a day.

militarily effective but politally distasteful, its all about a small group "stiffening" the spine of the local army.
just curious what you guys think.

Enfield
7 May 2001, 19:39
PMC's ain't all good news and gravy. EO took diamond and resource rights to pay for itself, and after it was forced out the RUF started to use Ukrainian mercenaries (another PMC?) to bolster themselves.
EO eventually went out of business because fighting third world wars doesn't pay enough to sustain a corporation. I'd argue that the Brits that are in Sierra Leone now are better for the nation than EO.
Lasty time I checked MPRI acted as only an arm of the State Department. And those same MPRI-trained Croatians fought a battle with UN peacekeepers (Medak Pocket).

Anyways, the UN and NATO are regulated, it answers to higher authorities, and it's transparent, though maybe not as effective as we wish.
PMC's do not offer a long-term solution for anything, once the payments dry up they're gone. And the ethical and moral side of the PMC's is unregulated. The UN comes with the rest of it's agencies - UNHCR, UNICEF, etc. - and they are what will stabilize a nation. Hired gun slingers/instructors won't keep a nation, and if an intervention is needed, the West maintains professional armies for just that.
If individual nations want to use private companies, great, but why privatize intervention and peacekeeping?

farseer
8 May 2001, 17:23
what about regulated PMC's in advance of UN intervention? "peace enforcement" is something they seem to accel at, where the member states of the UN have a demostrated distaste for losing soldiers in non-strategic important nations, i believe requests for support from England were initially turned down. So the west does have the armies, but do they have the politcal will to use them?

A possibility is for the PMC to go in, end the fighting by supporting internationally recognized governments, then the UN can safely deploy.


to a certain degree they do regulate themselves as atrocities makes for bad business. I see your point though, EO did create a lot of spin off companies to take advantage of angola and sierra leone. yet it seems to be something of an inevitability that these companies are going to be more prevailent in the near future.

EO was no angel, but the theory is sound (I think)

my personal military experience is zero, i'm rushing to get my papers in to make it for summer basic, so i'm just talking here. but it is interesting i think.