Tricare Price Hike for Retirees and 'adjusted' combat pay
I haven't seen this so I thought this would be good info for a lot of our folks.
While I agree that its bullshit that soemone can fly into a combat zone for an hour or two and get a month of combat, I also believe its bullshit that Congess is all about cutting spending on the backs of the military retirees when they could save a lot more money but cutting the amount of welfare, food stamps, and other 'incentives' to not work. I also believe that there should be mandatory random drug testing executed exactly like the military for all recipients of welfare and food stamps to prevent those funds being used to buy and use drugs.
Military Update: New Tricare Fees, End To Combat Pay 'Windfall' Voted
By Tom Philpott Special to Stars and Stripes
Published: June 23, 2011
The Senate Armed Services Committee has agreed with House colleagues to
approve a small increase in Tricare Prime enrollment fees for working-age
retirees, and to allow these fees to be raised annually by the percentage
cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) applied to military retired pay.
The vote ensures that Tricare Prime enrollment fees for individual retirees
under age 65 will be raised in the new fiscal year by $30, to $260 a year,
and that retiree family coverage will climb by $60, to $520. These will be
the first fee increases since Tricare rates were set in 1995.
The Senate panel also joined with the House to endorse an Obama
administration plan to restructure Tricare pharmacy co-payments to encourage
use of mail order for refills instead of having local drugstores, at far
greater cost to the government, refill prescriptions for chronic conditions.
Through Tricare "home delivery," patients get a 90-day supply of pills
versus a 30-day supply from retail outlets. Defense officials intend to make
mail order more attractive by ending a $3 charge for generic drugs and
raising the co-pay for generic medicines at retail outlets to $5, up from
Co-pays for brand name drugs on the military formulary would stay at $9 by
mail but climb to $12 at retail pharmacies. For non-formulary brand drugs,
the $22 co-pay would climb to $25 for mail order and retail. The new co-pays
are projected to save $2.6 billion over five years, or five times the
savings projected from higher Tricare Prime fees on working age retirees.
The Senate committee also voted with the House to support a 1.6 percent
military pay increase next January, enough to ensure that pay keeps pace
with private sector wage growth.
But the Senate committee parted ways with the House version of the fiscal
2012 defense authorization bill on a number of other personnel issues.
Here's a rundown of some key differences that will have to be reconciled
before Congress can pass a final defense authorization bill later this year:
Combat Pay Windfall - Only the Senate bill would require the services to
begin to prorate monthly imminent danger pay and hostile fire pay of $225 a
month based on number of days in designated danger areas. Under current law,
spending only part of a day in a war zone or imminent danger area makes a
member eligible for the full $225 payment.
Amid the looming debt crisis, and congressional leaders searching for ways
to lower federal spending, senators decided to address perceived combat pay
windfalls to save $30 million a year. The main targets are persons on
temporary assignments. Flight crews, for example, can spend only hours in
Afghanistan and get a full month of danger pay.
The committee also received reports of military personnel attending
first-of-the-month change of command ceremonies in war zones and, by
arriving a day early and departing immediately after the ceremony,
qualifying for two months of danger pay.
Members on full deployments also would be impacted by this change.
Currently, if a member on a yearlong, wartime deployment arrives mid-month
and, a year later, departs mid-month, he or she qualifies for a total of 13
months of danger pay. If the prorated formula becomes law, total payments
would reflect the actual length of deployment, ending the extra month of
danger pay so many members now receive.
Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance - The Senate bill is silent on a
House-passed provision that would ease further a reduction in Survivor
Benefit Plan payments felt by 57,000 surviving military spouses.
Spouses of these survivors either have died on active duty or, in retirement
from a service-connected injury or ailment. As a result they qualify for
tax-free Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) from VA. But to accept
DIC they must forfeit an equal amount of taxable SBP.
To ease this so-called "widow's tax," Congress four years ago authorized a
Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance (SSIA) valued now at $70 a month and
rising by $10 a year until it hits $100 by 2014. The House version of this
year's defense bill would raise SSIA higher and extend its life so that by
fiscal 2017 payments would reach $314 a month.
The House was able to pay for this $150 million SSIA initiative in part by
accepting the administration's plan to curb costs linked to the Uniformed
Services Family Health Plan, a managed care plan for military beneficiaries
living in six areas of the U.S. near former Public Health Service hospitals.
The Senate bill also would curb costs under USFHP, as we describe below. But
rather than use the dollars saved to expand SSIA, senators choose to beef up
incentives available to downsize the force.
Force Shaping Tools - The Senate bill would give the services three new or
extended authorities to downsize forces. One new tool would be a "voluntary
retirement payment" which could be offered to certain officers with between
20 and 29 years of service if they agree to retiree. The payment could equal
up to 12 times an officer's monthly basic pay. This could be used as an
alternative to an early retirement board.
The Senate bill also would extend the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI)
authority that was set to expire. VIS is an annuity used extensively during
the Post-Cold War drawdown to entice members to leave service.
A third initiative would expand from three months to a full year the period
service prior to expiration of an enlistment contract that member could be
discharged without a loss of benefits such as the GI Bill. The change would
apply only to benefits, not pay or allowances.
USFHP and Medicare - Both the Senate and House would require individuals
newly enrolled in the Uniformed Services Family Health Plan to transition to
Tricare for Life, and out of USFHP, as they become Medicare eligible due to
But only the Senate bill praises the USFHP model and directs Defense
officials to work with USFHP and Medicare to develop and evaluate health
plan alternatives for Tricare for Life beneficiaries so they can get
integrated health care management like that being delivered to elderly
Shallow men believe in luck; strong men believe in cause and effect