Go Back   SOCNET: The Special Operations Community Network > General Topics > Terrorism and Asymmetric Warfare

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 August 2007, 09:26
T-Rock T-Rock is offline
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Foothills
Posts: 517
Is The Bond of Ummah Stronger Than The Bond of Nationhood?

.....just curious (assimilation)? Interesting video:

Although I'll not post a link (Ummahdotcom), here is a an interesting discussion board linked from LGF:
Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2007, 09:42
Jimbo's Avatar
Jimbo Jimbo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: inside your OODA loop
Posts: 6,377
Seriously, please read Understanding Terrorist Networks by Marc Sageman.

Then read Imagined Communities by Benedict Anderson. And then read In the Name of Identity: Violence and the Need to Belong by Amin Maalouf.

And then answer your subject line question yourself.

“It's not a good idea to allow an unknown enemy force to attack your compound. Ever, really.” -MixedLoad

"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." -HST

Secrets don't sleep til they're took to the grave. -BMTH
Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2007, 18:58
T-Rock T-Rock is offline
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Foothills
Posts: 517
Thumbs up

Thanks Jimbo for the recommendations, I was looking for something to take with me on our beach trip...
Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2007, 20:06
Typhoon's Avatar
Typhoon Typhoon is offline
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Walk of Life
Posts: 1,564
Thanks for the book recommendations, Jimbo. I got 'em on my post it notes and I'll get to them when I have a bunch of free time this winter at the track meets...:)
Get Better Every Day!
Success depends on the functioning of the glands -- sweat glands.
--Coach Dan “Lake” Staffieri 1925-2010
Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2007, 06:37
MixedLoad's Avatar
MixedLoad MixedLoad is offline
Been There Done That
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: US
Posts: 9,309
Just ordered all three books.
“Suaviter in modo, fortiter in re"
Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2007, 10:06
walkin' trails walkin' trails is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 11
I read an article yesterday in the IACSP's Counter Terrorism journal (found it on the magazine rack in Borders). The article was entitled, "The Orgins and Goals of Radical Islam: Why First Responders Need to Know," by Henry Morgenstern. It summed up much of the YouTube videos in a nutshell and listed some of the ideas of the radical "Brotherhood." One such idea was that no form of government, democracy in particular, was good for muslims, although if a government was necessary, a dictatorship was preferred. The irony is that radical Islam seems to be flourishing under the protection of free speach, one of the pillars of a democracy.
Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 01:36
Gryfen-FL Gryfen-FL is offline
Authorized Personnel
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: east coast
Posts: 3,255
if a government was necessary, a dictatorship was preferred
Future of Political Islam by Grahm E. Fuller ( Thanks, Jimbo ) has some interesting ideas about why radical islam flourishes under certain types of government. And also raises a resounding indictment about what type of government Islamist movements would likely form if they came to power.
Since it was Virginia, did they go ahead and write a traffic ticket to the corpse when they were done?
Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2007, 01:04
T-Rock T-Rock is offline
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Foothills
Posts: 517
Just started “Understanding Terror Networks” today….one thing caught my eye in the opening chapter and it had to do with “Jihad”. The author describes the greater jihad as an individual nonviolent struggle……the jihad accepted by most Muslims…....striving to live a good life whereas he refers to violent jihad as the lesser of importance. Do most Muslims really see it this way? I’m just curious if his research starts from a false premise? The reason I question his premise is this: In medicine, in order to obtain the right diagnosis and implement the proper treatment, healthcare workers must know what disease they’re actually dealing with in order to treat it effectively. I’m assuming this approach is utilized in solving the Radical Islamic problem as well? The author utilizes empirical science to obtain his conclusions; nevertheless, the idea of jihad being an inner struggle doesn’t support the statistical analysis. Are we biased with a western POV when trying to come up with a solution?
I’m definitely no Islamic scholar but it’s my understanding that all of Islam’s political doctrine is found in the text of the Qur’an, the Hadith, and the Sirah. If so, how exactly do Muslims see the real jihad? Is it inner struggle or the jihad of war? Statistically speaking, the majority of jihad references concerning war compromise about 97% of the doctrinal texts; (Qur’an, Hadith, Sirah) whereas, only about 3% of jihad references cover inner struggle within the Islamic texts. I’m wondering if western logic based on the law of contradiction will be able to come up with a solution regarding the problem of Global jihad? Is dualism the key to understanding Islam?
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Our new posting rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc. All Rights Reserved
© SOCNET 1996-2020