SOCNET

Go Back   SOCNET: The Special Operations Community Network > Areas of Expertise > FAC's, JTAC's and Fire Support

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18 December 2009, 22:05
CaptainKB CaptainKB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 20
Headsets?

In everyone's experience here, what dual channel headsets/earbuds/etc work well under a helmet and in 120 degrees? I'm a USMC Bn Air O looking to upgrade from what I have (nothing), and I need to be able to monitor and talk on a 117 and a 152 wearing all my gear in a very hot environment. Peltors look pretty neat, but I can't imagine those being comfortable at all when it gets hot.

Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18 December 2009, 22:27
Sharky's Avatar
Sharky Sharky is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: SOCNET
Posts: 20,432
You're right. Peltors will fill up the earcups with sweat. I used a Thales hand mic in Helmand this past summer and it worked fine. Not quiet but we werent trying to be quiet. Just make sure you have alternate hearing protection. I learned that part the hard way. Lost 30 decibels in the 4000mhz range this last trip.
__________________
I was born my papa's son
When I hit the ground I was on the run
I had one glad hand and the other behind
You can have yours, just give me mine
When the hound dog barkin' in the black of the night
Stick my hand in my pocket, everything's all right

-ZZ Top
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18 December 2009, 22:58
USMC_ANGLICO USMC_ANGLICO is offline
Former thousand-aire
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the company of warriors
Posts: 259
I agree a hand mic is a great way to go and have used it extensively in the past.

We also used the Quiet Pro system a lot during training and workup. I happened to like this piece of kit, the aircraft seemed to hear me better in higher winds and during operations and I could hear them better too. We also had ours hooked into our 153's so I could flip between the radio sets and talk to my team.

It takes some getting used to having multiple radio freqs playing in your head, but when i really needed to concentrate on only the air, i could just turn down the motorola.

Just my 2 cents...
__________________
RIP
"Southside" "Bub" "Rone" "Puddy" "Hawk" "Big'N" "Heeler" "Bong"

Maj Samuel "Swacq" Griffith, 4th ANGLICO - December 14, 2011 Helmand, Afghanistan

Capt Warren "War" Frank, 5th ANGLICO - November 25, 2008 Baiji, Iraq

GySgt Marcelo Velasco, 4th ANGLICO - November 19, 2008 Fallujah, Iraq

Sgt Jeremiah McGraw, 4th ANGLICO - September 10, 2009

Lightning from the Sky, Thunder from the Sea!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18 December 2009, 23:06
Ozymandias Ozymandias is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bragg
Posts: 27
Peltors are shakey, they will fail on you at the worst time possible. I also recommend the thales handmics they are solid.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19 December 2009, 01:17
VMI_Marine VMI_Marine is offline
Marine
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC_ANGLICO View Post
I agree a hand mic is a great way to go and have used it extensively in the past.

We also used the Quiet Pro system a lot during training and workup. I happened to like this piece of kit, the aircraft seemed to hear me better in higher winds and during operations and I could hear them better too. We also had ours hooked into our 153's so I could flip between the radio sets and talk to my team.

It takes some getting used to having multiple radio freqs playing in your head, but when i really needed to concentrate on only the air, i could just turn down the motorola.
So I'm not the only one who liked the QPs. Every other Marine I've talked to hated them. I've heard good things about Silynx Quietops (might be called C2ops or some such now). Personally, I controlled a section of Cobras using QPs while wearing a gas mask, and the pilots could not tell the difference. Also used them while on a SURC going about 20 knots on Lake Qadussiya, absolutely zero wind noise. However, they are a PITA to don. There is a dual comm version that will connect to two MBITRs, 117s, 152s, etc.
__________________
"This is how it is when the war machine rolls back and forth. You take your pleasure where you can and when you can, and let the circumstances be damned. For tomorrow you may be somewhere else." - Cass

"I understand all of the words you used, but I don't know what you just said." - Gen. Hagee speaking to the MEU S-3
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19 December 2009, 05:40
CaptainKB CaptainKB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 20
Yeah I tried on the QP, and I do not like how they feel. Do they take getting used to, and are there different sizes? Even if I could get them to fit and be comfortable, I only have the ones that can monitor 153's and another radio, so they're not usefull to me. The USMC is buying that dual comm version, but I have no clue when i'm actually going to see them.

Silynx certainly gets the prize for have the coolest website.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19 December 2009, 09:43
Ozymandias Ozymandias is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bragg
Posts: 27
Silynx has its problems as well, they are uncomfortable for most people if worn for over an hour or so. Also the amplification feature seems to go in and out. Some people swear by them, but not many.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19 December 2009, 13:37
Gray Rhyno's Avatar
Gray Rhyno Gray Rhyno is offline
Authorized Personnel
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NoVa
Posts: 10,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by VMI_Marine View Post
So I'm not the only one who liked the QPs. Every other Marine I've talked to hated them. I've heard good things about Silynx Quietops (might be called C2ops or some such now). Personally, I controlled a section of Cobras using QPs while wearing a gas mask, and the pilots could not tell the difference. Also used them while on a SURC going about 20 knots on Lake Qadussiya, absolutely zero wind noise. However, they are a PITA to don. There is a dual comm version that will connect to two MBITRs, 117s, 152s, etc.
WHAT?!?

I personally liked the QPs but didn't wear them long-term like VMI did. From what I saw, comfort level had a lot to do with being properly fitted for the ear pieces (5-6 sizes as I recall); improperly fitted ear pieces either gave you inner ear pain if too big or didn't work correctly if too small. Several other companies make QP-like headsets. IIRC, QP has three types; a single model that connects to a 153, a dual model that connects to a 153 and a second radio with a 5-pin connector, and a TACP model that connects to 2 radios with 5-pin connectors.
__________________
"The most HSLD stuff ever taught was the basics. So-called 'advanced training' is often no more than the very fluid and expert application of those basic skills." - SOTB
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19 December 2009, 18:13
VMI_Marine VMI_Marine is offline
Marine
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainKB View Post
Yeah I tried on the QP, and I do not like how they feel. Do they take getting used to, and are there different sizes? Even if I could get them to fit and be comfortable, I only have the ones that can monitor 153's and another radio, so they're not usefull to me. The USMC is buying that dual comm version, but I have no clue when i'm actually going to see them.
Talk to 2d ANGLICO's comm shop, they have the purchasing info. Thanks to a certain JTAC who had the CO's ear when it came to those sorts of things.

I went down to small earpieces, and had a much easier time. My biggest complaints are 1) donning them, and 2) I went from mounted to dismounted and back again. I am a big fan of vehicle intercom systems, but the QPs that the Marine Corps bought are not compatible with TOCNET or VIC-3. I don't want one headset in the vehicle and another for walkabouts. I want to unplug from the intercom box, plug into my manpack and go. Oh yeah, and compatibility with ICS systems would be nice, too.

One thought - look into McDowell Research's SOCOM-X headset. In the ear active hearing protection, but uses a boom mic like Peltors or Sordins. I would suspect that the boom mike eliminates the need to insert the earpiece until it touches gray matter.

As an aside, I always wanted to check out one of the wearable antennas. Goes inside your SAPI plate pockets, and ranges from 30-512 mHz. I don't know how deep your battalion's pockets are, but the worst they can do is say no, right?
__________________
"This is how it is when the war machine rolls back and forth. You take your pleasure where you can and when you can, and let the circumstances be damned. For tomorrow you may be somewhere else." - Cass

"I understand all of the words you used, but I don't know what you just said." - Gen. Hagee speaking to the MEU S-3
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19 December 2009, 18:35
VMI_Marine VMI_Marine is offline
Marine
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,112
As we continue to go down the technological rabbit hole here, I'll re-iterate what Sharky, ODB, and Ozymandias said. Whenever a particular headset wasn't working out, I invariably fell back on the Thales hand mics. Those things are just damned versatile. Even if you find the perfect headset that does everything you want, have one of the Thales hand mics as a backup. I think the actual nomenclature is "speaker microphone" if you want to search for an NSN.
__________________
"This is how it is when the war machine rolls back and forth. You take your pleasure where you can and when you can, and let the circumstances be damned. For tomorrow you may be somewhere else." - Cass

"I understand all of the words you used, but I don't know what you just said." - Gen. Hagee speaking to the MEU S-3
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21 December 2009, 12:47
swamppirate's Avatar
swamppirate swamppirate is offline
In From The East
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Deep in Tea Party Country
Posts: 2,288
"I've heard good things about Silynx Quietops (might be called C2ops or some such now" Don't walk away....run away from these....we used them recently in the sandbox and they sucked. We had problems with using them in HMV's, MRAP's and helo ops. They squel (even when the correct settings are made). There are way to many wires going everywhere...they snagged on everything. The side connector that pulled power from the MBTR did not function correctly causing us to constantly use AA batts...and they gobbled them up. The ear foam plugs continouly popped out (although that could be fixed with after market plugs.) So needless to say we sent ours back...my .02
__________________
Tied to the whippin’ Post...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 25 December 2009, 14:22
Resqguy Resqguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 7
Have any of you guys looked into the Liberator seris from TCI ? They have single and duel comm versions. Pretty solid looking too. Just a thought .

http://www.merchantmanager.com/tacti...wide_comms.htm
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 25 December 2009, 14:51
Sharky's Avatar
Sharky Sharky is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: SOCNET
Posts: 20,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resqguy View Post
Have any of you guys looked into the Liberator seris from TCI ? They have single and duel comm versions. Pretty solid looking too. Just a thought .

http://www.merchantmanager.com/tacti...wide_comms.htm


I bought five sets of the single comm versions from TCI last year. Some worked okay but two of them squealed/hummed pretty bad when keying up and no audio was transmitted. I wont buy from them again. From here on they will be MSA/Peltor.
__________________
I was born my papa's son
When I hit the ground I was on the run
I had one glad hand and the other behind
You can have yours, just give me mine
When the hound dog barkin' in the black of the night
Stick my hand in my pocket, everything's all right

-ZZ Top
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28 December 2009, 01:28
VMI_Marine VMI_Marine is offline
Marine
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by swamppirate View Post
"I've heard good things about Silynx Quietops (might be called C2ops or some such now" Don't walk away....run away from these....we used them recently in the sandbox and they sucked. We had problems with using them in HMV's, MRAP's and helo ops. They squel (even when the correct settings are made). There are way to many wires going everywhere...they snagged on everything. The side connector that pulled power from the MBTR did not function correctly causing us to constantly use AA batts...and they gobbled them up. The ear foam plugs continouly popped out (although that could be fixed with after market plugs.) So needless to say we sent ours back...my .02

Good to know, thanks for the input.
__________________
"This is how it is when the war machine rolls back and forth. You take your pleasure where you can and when you can, and let the circumstances be damned. For tomorrow you may be somewhere else." - Cass

"I understand all of the words you used, but I don't know what you just said." - Gen. Hagee speaking to the MEU S-3
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28 December 2009, 09:10
swamppirate's Avatar
swamppirate swamppirate is offline
In From The East
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Deep in Tea Party Country
Posts: 2,288
VMI Marine, PM inbound....
__________________
Tied to the whippin’ Post...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 23 March 2010, 12:24
KellyTTE KellyTTE is offline
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 67
I hate to drag this thread up from the dead, but does anyone have the NSN for JUST the Nacre Quietpro unit itself? We spotted some gear in DRMO for a unit I work with, but before we jump thru the DRMS hoops, we wanted to verify we had the right NSN.

POSSIBLY 7610-25-151-3802

Any help. Thanks!

KellyTTE
__________________
Kelly H
http://www.ttellc.net
kellyh@ttellc.net
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 24 March 2010, 06:03
usnavy_233 usnavy_233 is offline
Genius
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UNDISCLOSED
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resqguy View Post
Have any of you guys looked into the Liberator seris from TCI ? They have single and duel comm versions. Pretty solid looking too. Just a thought .

http://www.merchantmanager.com/tacti...wide_comms.htm

We're using liberators in the unit I'm with now. They shit the bed consistently around water. Not sure how they would fair outside of that because we haven't been able to keep ours running long enough to make an informed decision. First impression is stay away.

There's another company making a smiliar product; MSA Sordin. We bought some of those in hopes that they would be better than the liberators. Haven't had much luck with them either. Again, breaking easily and the MSAs that we have don't have a wind cup over the mic so you get allot of feedback, engine noise, etc. That part is easy enough to fix, but the fact that we had 5 of 9 go down on the same mission should tell you something. I'd shy away from those to if I were you. Just my $.02

EDITED: Just realized that the threat is pretty much done at this point.
__________________
"A nation of sheep will beget a Government of wolves."

Last edited by usnavy_233; 24 March 2010 at 06:05. Reason: Didn't realize the thread was so old.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10 May 2010, 20:45
Birdman23 Birdman23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OKC
Posts: 21
I had a lot of success with the Thales handmic. I also had the plastic earbud attachment, which is basically an earplug with a speaker. I stuffed an earplug in the other ear during air assault missions and together they worked very well. I reinforced the connections from the speaker mic to the earbud with tape to make sure they wouldn't come unplugged very easily if they were snagged and I never had an issue. I still rock the same setup to this day, it's even comfy.

I have a Liberator in my kit inventory and I never use it. I find the PTT box and calbing to be bulky, they break, and i don't like wearing a headset in 100+ degree temps when I can wear the above.

Just my .02
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 29 August 2010, 01:01
Push-to-think Push-to-think is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: East coast
Posts: 18
VMI Marine, please do tell more about those full up integrated antennas. Any positive reviews? Pls post link if able
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 29 August 2010, 10:27
VMI_Marine VMI_Marine is offline
Marine
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,112
I'll have to do some looking for the info. I was on a MiTT for a year, so I didn't touch any of that. I can at least point you in the right direction to do some research.
__________________
"This is how it is when the war machine rolls back and forth. You take your pleasure where you can and when you can, and let the circumstances be damned. For tomorrow you may be somewhere else." - Cass

"I understand all of the words you used, but I don't know what you just said." - Gen. Hagee speaking to the MEU S-3
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Our new posting rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Socnet.com All Rights Reserved
© SOCNET 1996-2018