Go Back   SOCNET: The Special Operations Community Network > Welcome To SOCNET > How Not to Post

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 October 2011, 16:26
JustVisiting JustVisiting is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 21
Two questions/suggestions on how the military should be run.

I don't have any military experience, so I really hope this doesn't come off as "I know better than you do." These two things seem fairly obvious to me, and if there is an obvious explanation for these things that I didn't notice, feel free to say "Hey dumbass! We do this because of X, Y, Z!" I have searched the forum and didn't find either of these questions being addressed, I have also searched Google and even asked former military members. All without getting a satisfactory explanation. My suggestions, in a nutshell, are get rid of the enlisted/officer distinction and merge all the branches into one.

Officer/Enlisted Distinction:
This exists for historical class reasons. (ie The children of nobles/kings getting more privileges.) Nowadays, it seems completely idiotic and anti-meritocratic. It seems to me that everybody should start at the bottom and that promotions should basically come at twice the speed. Yes, I'm aware that higher ranking enlisted and officer promotions take more time, but they could standardize this so that all officers start at the bottom and work their way up. From everything that I've seen in movies/on television, read in books, or heard from former soldiers, most officers, particularly new ones, aren't respected by their subordinates because they simply aren't qualified to lead. Most of them are very young and have little to no experience and they are in command of much older much more experienced soldiers. Who by right, should be the ones leading. The only thing separating them is a college degree, and career enlisted soldiers often have at least a bachelors degree. Which makes them even more educated than their leaders in many cases. Any reason to maintain this separation?

Merge the Branches:
There seems to be a lot of redundancy in military jobs. Not just the obvious like cooks and doctors, but in virtually all areas. Marine infantry vs Army infantry, Navy SEALs vs Army Combat Divers, DEVGRU vs Delta Force, snipers from several branches, fighter pilots in the Navy and Air Force, etc. In the old days, there was a clear reason for a distinction between armies and navies. But now, with the level of technology that we have, every branch has a ton of people doing virtually the same thing. It seems to me that they should merge them into one to get rid of the redundancy. It would also do away with all of the dumbass hypothetical questions. (ie "If you put one Army Ranger, one Navy SEAL, one Delta Force Operator, One DEVGRU guy, one Green Beret, One Marine Force Recon dude, and one Marine Sniper all on a small island, and gave them each an M4A1 with precisely 60 bullets and a hunting knife, who would win lolz hehehe?") The only thing that I can think of for having this is the rivalries. But that to me doesn't seem like enough to justify the competing commands which result on various groups stepping on the toes of their fellow special force units, nor the redundancy and inefficiency of it all.

Thoughts? Comments?
Old 24 October 2011, 16:42
SOTB's Avatar
SOTB SOTB is offline
Minus one, but more symmetrical....
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Clorox'ing the gene pool....
Posts: 32,813
Originally Posted by JustVisiting
I don't have any military experience....
This is the only relevant portion of your post....
Losing faith in humanity, one assclown at a time....
Old 24 October 2011, 16:43
Whitebean54's Avatar
Whitebean54 Whitebean54 is offline
Road Scum
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Road
Posts: 3,454
The fact that you put "lolz" in your post completely negates anything of value that may have been in it.
"Somewhere, theres a skeleton, a book sack and a log with a fat girls signature " Jumpcut

" a world class ass-clown who is running this jack-assery version of laser tag" USMC_ANGLICO

Last edited by Whitebean54; 24 October 2011 at 16:44. Reason: SOTB beat me to it...
Old 24 October 2011, 16:44
Gsniper Gsniper is offline
Shakin' the bush Boss
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,871
Old 24 October 2011, 16:51
VelociMorte VelociMorte is offline
On the Extract Bird
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Home
Posts: 859
This probably isn't going to go the way you expected, but it should be "lolz" for everyone else.
Old 24 October 2011, 16:52
sinjefe sinjefe is offline
Been There Done That
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 530
Originally Posted by SOTB View Post
This is the only relevant portion of your post....
Ain't that the truth.
Old 24 October 2011, 16:53
JustVisiting JustVisiting is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by Whitebean54 View Post
The fact that you put "lolz" in your post completely negates anything of value that may have been in it.
I put it as a quote, discussing the people that make those hypothetical "Ranger VS Seal" type of questions. All you have to do is spend 5 minutes on Yahoo Answers to see the million and one questions of that very nature.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Our new posting rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:34.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc. All Rights Reserved
SOCNET 1996-2020