|
||
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anybody read Operation Broken Reed
Operation Broken Reed: Truman's Secret North Korean Spy Mission That Averted World War III?
A coworker told me about it. Pretty amazing story. A group of Rangers, Intel types and UDT guys pose as a captured B-29 crew being escorted by friendly asian troops posing as Chinese Communist guards. They move across Communist Asia reporting on the Chinese and Russian military buildup just when Truman is thinking about escalating the war.
__________________
At the end of the most grandiose plans and strategies is a soldier walking point. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Review on Amazon.com:
"By Wayne Lusvardi "Wayne Lusvardi" (Pasadena, CA United States) - See all my reviews I agree totally with the above book review with the exception that Lt. Col. Boyd unfortunately picked a professional writer, Michael Peterson, who, according to Wikipedia, during a run for mayor of Durham, North Carolina, inflated his past military record; and now sits in prison on a life sentence for murder of his wife, which Boyd discloses in his book. Conversely, it is reported that some 50 persons reviewed the book, most of whom he names at the end of the book. An afterward, written by a Jay T. Young, former analyst for the CIA and Naval officer in Naval Intelligence, also helps corroborate the story. Boyd has a section of the book where he exhorts those who were involved with Operation Broken Reed to come forward to confirm the story. Unfortunately, I could not find a website for this book or author where such first person corroborations could be found. The book is not written to glorify the author but to tell a story. You be the judge." I'm somewhat skeptical of this account. Needs corroboration. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tracy,
I saw that review which is why I posted the link. But I found this and decided the book needed more examination; "The book is not written to glorify the author but to tell a story. You be the judge." I will read it for free as a co-worker has it though it might be weeks before I get the chance.
__________________
At the end of the most grandiose plans and strategies is a soldier walking point. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm reading the book now.
The book is more 'polished' than I was expecting. However, if the manuscript has been through the forge of a publisher, a professional co-author, and review by those listed at end of the book, the prose and the story have withstood a test. I think we've all see a lot of books that were just BS from page one that somehow was labeled as non-fiction. This does not seem to fit the mold. The author responds to the Wayne Lusvardi review.... Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RetPara,
Did you ever make it through this book? The issue of it's veracity has recently been raised in cyptologic history circles. I haven't been able to read it as of yet and I was wondering what your opinion of it was? My instinct is that it's a little far fetched.
__________________
No Statement, No Waiver, No Poly! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Has anyone seen a copy of "The Seven Fingers"? I don't know the author, though it's about the rescue mission to retrieve Gary Powers through Laos. It took four years for the surviving team members to extricate themselves from Laos.
I haven't been able to find this book anywhere; it's out of print. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are you talking about The Five Fingers by Gayle Rivers?
__________________
God is great, beer is good, people are crazy...... |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are a few books out there about that effort. So while the mission and oath of secrecy is possible; it remains a far fetched possibility since only the author and a couple of others survived. Its a good story and a good read.
__________________
God is great, beer is good, people are crazy...... |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
__________________
" what is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end." |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
You may be right... If I recall correctly it was 7 fingers; I AM okay with being wrong (if I am), however. I'd just like to read the book.
And thanks for the reference Max Last edited by Psi Brr; 10 August 2009 at 22:32. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Technical questions
I found Operation Broken Reed interesting, but found some serious plausibility questions in the technical communications descriptions.
1. The frequency range used to communicate was unstated but clearly had to be UHF or at least VHF to be able to transmit while on the move with an inconspicuous antenna. This conclusion is also supported in the fact that the communication went to an aircraft, not a ground station. 2. Why did the North Koreans not detect the signal and DF it? Was the frequency so far out of any expected communication frequency range that they had no way to intercept it or no expectation to find anything there. This again supports the UHF frequency range, but it seems odd that nobody stumbled onto it. The transmitting antenna couldn't have been highly directional because the senders didn't know where the aircraft was -- except up. Also a highly directional antenna, even at UHF, would be physically conspicuous. I kept waiting for some details on frequency and antenna from this experienced communications officer to add plausibility, but there were none. 3. Transmission was hand-sent Morse for up to two hours at a time?? What kind of COMSEC/OPSEC is that?? There were burst devices available at that time. They could afford a crypto machine, but not a burst device? This makes no sense. Finally a question that isn't technical. There was only one survivor on the ground. OK, but how many survivors of this operation were there in the air? If this really happened, there must be somebody else out there who was part of it. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|