|
|
|
|
|
#1
4 February 2012, 21:26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If he was not doing his job, fire him. How much do you know about the pristine background of Gov. Rick Scott?
__________________
Life’s barely long enough to get good at one thing. So be careful what you get good at. Last edited by gavin; 4 February 2012 at 21:30. 
|
|
#2
4 February 2012, 21:38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree, if he was not doing his job, fire him. And if the job was "created" in some kind of buddy buddy scheme, fire whomever created the position. I've never seen the need for a supervisor for 8 people where the supervisor's sole position is to supervise.
__________________
[SIZE="1"]Hey homo, its me -- Andy/SOTB[/size]
|
|
#3
5 February 2012, 08:46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Life’s barely long enough to get good at one thing. So be careful what you get good at.
|
|
#4
5 February 2012, 09:53
|
|||
|
|||
|
I voted for Scott and think he has done a great job so far, all the libtards hate him so that tells you all you need to know. As far as Col. Day, one of the greatest americans ever.He was also a Marine in WW2 and Korea with over 80 decorations , and has been THE biggest advocate for veterns rights. I wish Scott would rethink this.
|
|
#5
6 April 2012, 22:06
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Post an intro, soon.
__________________
No one will take better care of us, than us: Suicide Hotline: 1-800-273-8255 “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” - G. Orwell The chair is against the wall, the chair is against the wall.
|
|
#6
2 July 2012, 06:07
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
5 February 2012, 17:17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You saying none of those folks around you are arrogant.
__________________
FISHDO Last edited by SN; 5 February 2012 at 17:19.
|
|
#8
5 February 2012, 18:18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Just seems to me there is an adequate reason for an investigation, and a responsibility to the taxpayer. Maybe not, maybe it's all political, but no one should get a position at the taxpayer's expense based on their military exploits or who they know or who they are. If the Govt wants to run a job service program for MOH recipients, then propose a law, make it so, and let's pay them a salary every year. But no one is above scrutiny. If he was doing his job satisfactorily there's nothing to worry about. If he wasn't there is. If someone created the job through cronyism, there's something amiss there, too. No one is above scrutiny when they are on the taxpayer's dime. No one.
__________________
[SIZE="1"]Hey homo, its me -- Andy/SOTB[/size]
|
|
#9
7 February 2012, 16:29
|
|||
|
|||
|
So if it is determined that this man was hired to do a job with taxpayer's dollars that really consisted of nothing but sitting around drinking coffee, you eliminate the job and send him home. If he was expected to do more but didn't do it....same thing...you fire him. A special prosecutor investigation indicates the possibility of some type of fraud charge. Only way I see any type of fraud is if he were pretending to be doing something that he was never doing. Maybe that's the case. All we have to go on is the article.
If somebody offered me $84,000 and gave me a title and told me I could basically do whatever or as little as I wanted, I'd ride that horse as long as I could. Would I be breaking any law in doing so? The person that hired me might have some answering to do when it became evident but I don't see where I could be charged with anything criminally. Then again, maybe I'm wrong....just the way I see it.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
